• APassenger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        23 days ago

        I stopped using them months ago. I only notice when I’m looking for places (e.g., restaurants, barbers).

        I’m not unhappy but may still shop around.

        • Pixel@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          23 days ago

          yeah, I appreciate the push towards more privacy-centric search engines but as a result searches that are relevant to me geographically on places like startpage are next to useless. I understand why but I wish that local results were a bit better on the alternatives.

      • doctortran@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        23 days ago

        We all keep saying this but can anybody point me to which one is better?

        I invariably end up having to go back to them because the other search engines all have their own problems.

        The issue is the internet is polluted with SEO and all the useful things that used to be spread out are now condensed onto places like Reddit, or places that aren’t even being indexed.

        • MagicShel@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          23 days ago

          Supposedly there’s a paid one that is good. I haven’t tried. The thing is Google is completely enshittified. They don’t have to care about you or the sites you search. So my theory is Bing is better because they are hungrier and anything that takes away market share from Google is good—but I’m fully aware that Microsoft was just as shitty as Google and will be again if they get back on top.

          Everything else I know of is either just an alternate front end for one of them or an aggregator of both. So you’re right, there’s precious little alternative to Google. But it’s almost bad enough I’m ready for the return of web rings of good sites vouching for each other.

            • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              23 days ago

              Serious question. Can you spell out for me the exact advantages you feel they provide? I have a free account, but every time I try them out I feel like their answers are honestly a little bit worse than Ecosia.

              • 31337@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                22 days ago

                I find Kagi results a little bit better than Google’s (for most things). I like that certain categories of results are put in their own sections (listicles, forums) so they’re easy to ignore if you want. I like that I can prioritize, deprioritize, block, or pin results from certain domains. I like that I can quickly switch “lenses” to one of the predefined or custom lenses.

            • AeroLemming@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              23 days ago

              This is funny, but it was also 13 years ago. A lot can change in that time. I don’t personally use Bing though, so I don’t have firsthand experience either way.

              • bitwaba@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                23 days ago

                A lot can change in 13 years, but a company that starts off morally evil does not magically get better as time goes on. If anything, they’re worse - we just don’t have the luxury of knowing exactly how yet.

                • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  23 days ago

                  He didn’t say they weren’t evil. Only that because they are behind they are trying harder than Google (which is also evil).

                • AeroLemming@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  23 days ago

                  All I’m trying to say is that they’re not necessarily doing the same thing now that they were back then. They’d have a strong motivator to be better than google nowadays instead of just copying their results because google’s results suck now.

            • MagicShel@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              23 days ago

              If that was what you took from my post, give it another read. I’m not pro MS. I’m pro not feeding Google. And Bing is fine.

              • bitwaba@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                23 days ago

                I’m not pro MS. I’m pro not feeding Google.

                I feel like this is similar to arguing that Exxon is bad so it’s better to buy gas from BP.

                Both are shitty options.

                • MagicShel@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  23 days ago

                  Thankfully there are other options because you just nailed the two places I refuse to ever get gas from when there is any other option. If there was a good third option I’d take it here, but while Google commands so much market share and a new competitor would probably siphon users from Bing (and it’s not enough users) I don’t think a real alternative will come. I’m intrigued by kagi, though.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 days ago

      Part 5 is where I don’t see this actually going.

      Look at twitter. Now look at mastodon. Tell me which one is more shitty. Now tell me which one has something like 85% of the market, and which one most people haven’t heard of.

      Just because something it better, doesn’t mean people use it. You can fit all of Lemmy in the world in one of the larger NBA size arenas. You can’t even fit twitters total user base into some smaller CITIES.

        • hobovision@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          23 days ago

          He’s already owned it for nearly two years. I’d definitely take the over on that bet. I just don’t see what Twitter could possibly do that they haven’t done already to kill it?

          • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 days ago

            This last “let’s sue advertisers to force them to come back a d put their ads next to neo Nazis” is just another nail in the coffin.

            Hell Be gone soon enough and his legacy will be “what did anyone ever see in that scammer?”

          • Womble@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            23 days ago

            At least in the UK there is now lots of mainstream discussion of “Is it time for people to leave twitter as it’s too much of a cesspool”. Granted they usually then mention threads or bluesky as an alternative not mastodon, but it is definitely possible for social media companies to die out. Once people start to leave in large numbers it can become a mass exodus (see digg and myspace).

            • Balder@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              23 days ago

              I think the issue now is that the market got fragmented and now you can’t find as much content as before without using multiple services, which is an annoyance.

          • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 days ago

            He’s now suing advertisers to force them to pay him money because he told them (literal quote) to go fuck them selves after they didn’t wanted to have their ads shown next to neo Nazis, and well, they all left. Good luck with that, forcing advertisers to come back, lol.

            Twitter is barely having any income and the interest in the loans to buy twitter alone cost a billion per year.

            Twitter (and I fucking refuse to call it x) will be gone soon

      • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        I think the amount of people who are familiar with search engine options besides Google is quite a bit larger than the population of Lemmy. (It fuckin better be, anyway)

    • Zurgo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      23 days ago

      I’m pretty pessimistic about this:

      1. Say no
      2. Google still scrapes your site to train their AI
      3. People don’t care that its wrong, still use Google instead of other search engines
    • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 days ago
      1. Say no
      2. You don’t show up in Google search results
      3. You still show up in other search results
      4. Google is no longer bringing the best results
      5. People stop using your site
      6. You lose
    • UprisingVoltage@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      23 days ago

      Unfortunately, the vast majority of people do not give a single fuck and they will use whatever is preinstalled on their device

    • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      24 days ago

      For now.

      DDG gets search results from Bing, owned by Microsoft. And I wouldn’t be surprised if the later did the same as Google did.

      • Q*Bert Reynolds@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        That’s technically true, but it’s as misleading as saying they get their search results from Yandex. Their results are aggregated from several search engines, not just Bing. They also have their own web crawler, DuckDuckBot, which absolutely respects RobotRules.

        Edit: I’m told my information is out of date. No more Yandex because of Uncle Sam. Yahoo is just Bing now, so that index doesn’t count anymore. The bulk of the rest of their sources are largely inconsequential specialized search engines. Their sources page states that they “largely source from Bing”.

    • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      24 days ago

      DuckDuckGo is just Bing. Which is uh… going from Google to Microsoft. Maybe not much better either

  • Subverb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    23 days ago

    We’re at a point where not only should the Internet be classified as a utility, so should Search.

    • Gsus4@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      Yeah, it’s not just e.g. water that is the utility, pipes and pumping stations are part of it. Otherwise you have water…uh…somewhere, go get it yourself.

  • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    23 days ago

    Oh look, more anticompetitive shenanigans.

    Break Google up. Bring the full force of antitrust down on them.

    Anything else is an unmitigated disaster waiting to happen.

  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    Can someone explain why the fuck Google is pushing this so hard? Generative AI is not a general intelligence, and useless for concrete facts. Google has already demonstrated how shitty it is for information, and the people with the knowledge to work on the project have to know this.

    So why the fuck are they all full steam ahead on something that will always be useless for them?

    • towerful@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      AI is hype.
      They’ve recently signed a deal with Reddit for AI parsable data. Reddit reciprocated by allowing Google to be the only indexable search engine.
      Google now thinks it can do the same to literally everyone else.
      Googling is pretty damn mainstream.
      Don’t give Google your data, then don’t be included in googles search results. It’s like a flip of their previous trade with reddit, except it’s not a trade. It’s extortion.

      Reddit never gave Google traffic. They gave them content and data.
      And Google thinks it can withdraw traffic from other sites unless they get data in return.
      Google is a monopoly.
      Literally extortion

    • 31337@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 days ago

      Their line goes up when they show they’re investing in AI, and it goes down when it looks like they’re falling behind or not investing enough in it.

      TBH, a lot of times I find myself interacting with ChatGPT instead of searching. It’s overhyped, but it’s useful.

    • exanime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      I found ecosia faster and better results. Just letting you know in case you want to try

            • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              23 days ago

              Just looked it up to confirm. From DuckDuckGo’s page on the topic:

              Most of our search result pages feature one or more Instant Answers. To deliver Instant Answers on specific topics, DuckDuckGo leverages many sources, including specialized sources like Sportradar and crowd-sourced sites like Wikipedia. We also maintain our own crawler (DuckDuckBot) and many indexes to support our results. Of course, we have more traditional links and images in our search results too, which we largely source from Bing. Our focus is synthesizing all these sources to create a superior search experience.

              Edit: That said, I’d rather use DDG than Bing because DDG eats Bing’s tracking for me, as I understand it.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 days ago

      Ddg are shit too, search a name and they will relate it you locally even if you turn off regional results.

      Click a link and go back to results and they have changed.

      Ddg is enshittifying.

    • WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      23 days ago

      Same! I swore I wouldn’t pay for a search engine, but I feel like it’s absolutely worth it, considering the current state of things.

      • TrumpetX@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 days ago

        I might be wrong, but they meta-search across multiple providers, including their own. The real benefit is that YOU can choose which search subjects to prioritize when trying to find something specific.

        For normal search stuff, this feels like “old Google” (no ai spam). For detailed searching, its better than any other engine I’ve used.

    • ZephyrXero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 days ago

      It’s definitely better…but. Thanks to Google SEO the internet it’s bringing you results from is still filled with shit

  • Snowcano@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    23 days ago

    So how do I actually opt out? My website is just some personal hobby stuff on wordpress that only friends and family look at, I don’t need seo.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      I hope it happens one day, but that’s an almost insurmountable task given the scale.

      Take the entirety of the fediverse, and it’s entire history, and you’re probably talking a days worth of search engine indexing compute & storage.

      The scale is large and the fediverse is incredibly small. Keeping my fingers crossed, but definitely not holding my breath.

      In the meantime, I’ll use Kagi.

  • endofline@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    22 days ago

    That’s actually a good news. Maybe we’re able to revert the internet to the times before the Eternal September happened

    • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      This will never happen. We might get some of the issues more regulated, and people may move away from others, but you can’t put the Furies back into the box. Things will change, but we will never have the early internet again.

      • endofline@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        22 days ago

        We can, closed communities with some effort to enter the group. I pretty much ditched most main stream social media and use what it used to be mailing lists and discord servers. It’s not about technology. Internet and access used to be simply exclusive and we have to create exclusive channels to communicate about f.e. arts, history, technology or even occult where there is no “free riders” with no knowledge. That’s what I mean and this may happen imo. Quality over quantity

        • Allero@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          22 days ago

          Lemmy was at some point this pre-September place. Since then, it changed quite a bit.

          I think we’ll always have to face either Eternal September or walls and restrictions everywhere, making it hard to join and discouraging many genuinely good folks.

          Our best best is to influence the Internet culture at large, since there’s no grand influx of people on the Internet overall anymore. Of course, we go against algorithmic rage machines, but this is a fight worth having. And which place if not Fediverse is a good place to start.

  • bluewing@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    23 days ago

    I’ve switched from DuckDuckGo to Ghostery Private search. I’ve been happier with the results than DDG.

    • pacoboyd@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 days ago

      I’m using SEARXNG. It’s a search engine aggrigate and you can mix and match where you want your results to come from. It’s like using Google from a decade ago.

      • bluewing@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 days ago

        Interesting. That seems a fairly heavy duty search and possibly more than most users would want to go about installing. But it’s something to keep in mind if needed.

      • trailee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        I remember discovering MetaCrawler in the 90s (before Google was even founded) and it quickly became the go-to search engine because its aggregate results were superior to any of the other options at the time. I don’t think its source mix was tunable, but that sounds like appropriate progress for 30 years.

  • msage@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    22 days ago

    Please understand that this is the next ‘SEO’ shit.

    It was going to be this from the very start.

  • Kethal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    Google is genuinely bad now. I switched to Ecosia which is just Bing with a simpler front end and they use their profits to plant trees. I don’t think Ecosia is particularly special though. Duck Duck Go, Bing whatever, they’re all better than Google.

    Whenever I set up a new computer then search for something, I’m always surprised at first seeing the awful layout and quality of the search results before I realize that I haven’t changed the default search from Google. It’s awful now. Seriously, how are people using it?

    My new favorite way to search is perplexity.ai. It’s an AI search tool that summarizes the loads of crap out there so you don’t need to read through the junk that people write. It provides sources, unlike using ChatGPT, which is incredibly valuable. All AIs make shit up, so having links to double check it is a must. Unlike Bing Chat, or whatever Microsoft calls it this week, you can ask follow up questions to home in on what you want.