T (they/she)@beehaw.org to Linux@lemmy.ml · 1 day agoA word about systemdskarnet.orgexternal-linkmessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up158arrow-down110file-text
arrow-up148arrow-down1external-linkA word about systemdskarnet.orgT (they/she)@beehaw.org to Linux@lemmy.ml · 1 day agomessage-square82fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·1 day agoIt is faster on modern hardware due to heavy optimization
minus-squaredrwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 day agocan’t say I have experienced that. I use a myriad of modern but lower end systems and stuff like dinit still uses less resources and is in turn better for the speed and responsiveness of my systems
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 day agoI’ve run systemd on a system with 32mb of memory and a Pentium II. It was not the bottle neck and it booted right up.
It is faster on modern hardware due to heavy optimization
can’t say I have experienced that. I use a myriad of modern but lower end systems and stuff like dinit still uses less resources and is in turn better for the speed and responsiveness of my systems
I’ve run systemd on a system with 32mb of memory and a Pentium II. It was not the bottle neck and it booted right up.