This is maybe a little paranoid but… i have a jellyfin server that i let some family members use. one of them intends to use an app for apple tv, which i think is swiftfin or something like that. i am a bit skeptical about smart-TVs and the data they phone home with, so i was wondering if there is any chance that i could be compromised due to the linux isos i host on jellyfin due to some sneaky smart-TV stuff?

  • schizoEnglish
    192·
    21 days ago

    First: compromised how?

    Second: probably just being paranoid, Apple TV + open source apps are about as good as you’re going to get in terms of private viewing.

    The Apple TV might report app usage stats to Apple, but unless the app (which it doesn’t) reports other telemetry that’s not really useful in terms of anything other than, well, seeing that someone uses an app that plays media from Jellyfin.

    • lunsjentilanette@sh.itjust.worksOPEnglish
      22·
      21 days ago

      First: compromised how?

      I dont want to be receiving dmca letters (or similar where i live). So I mean having access to what is being played (the names of the files would be a dead giveaway).

      • Clusterfck@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
        14·
        21 days ago

        Let’s be real, it’s in those companies best interest that we never know even if they are seeing that. As soon as someone got a DMCA notice because their Roku told the government they pirated Deadpool, there would be a massive amount of damage control required.

      • schizoEnglish
        4·
        21 days ago

        Should be fine; I’ve used swiftfin on iOS devices (iPad, iPhone, and Apple TV) for literal years and the copyright police haven’t shown up.

          • schizoEnglish
            4·
            21 days ago

            Nothing wrong with asking a question, especially when you’re talking about devices that are notorious for sending every scrap of data they can gather to everywhere. (Looking at you, Roku.)

      • digdilem@lemmy.mlEnglish
        2·
        20 days ago

        Interesting though, that.

        IANAL, but I understand that most successful prosecutions have been for /distributing/ copyright material, rather than /consuming/ it. I think that’s quite a big distinction, legally, and watching a dodgy recording is less clearly illegal in many countries and may be entirely legal - even if they could prove that filename = actual file.