Google is developing a Terminal app for Android that’ll let you run Linux apps. It’ll download and run Debian in a VM for you.

Engineers at Google started work on a new Terminal app for Android a couple of weeks ago. This Terminal app is part of the Android Virtualization Framework (AVF) and contains a WebView that connects to a Linux virtual machine via a local IP address, allowing you to run Linux commands from the Android host. Initially, you had to manually enable this Terminal app using a shell command and then configure the Linux VM yourself. However, in recent days, Google began work on integrating the Terminal app into Android as well as turning it into an all-in-one app for running a Linux distro in a VM.

Google is still working on improving the Terminal app as well as AVF before shipping this feature. AVF already supports graphics and some input options, but it’s preparing to add support for backing up and restoring snapshots, nested virtualization, and devices with an x86_64 architecture. It’s also preparing to add some settings pages to the Terminal app, which is pretty barebones right now apart from a menu to copy the IP address and stop the existing VM instance. The settings pages will let you resize the disk, configure port forwarding, and potentially recover partitions.

If you’re wondering why you’d want to run Linux apps on Android, then this feature is probably not for you. Google added Linux support to Chrome OS so developers with Chromebooks can run Linux apps that are useful for development. For example, Linux support on Chrome OS allows developers to run the Linux version of Android Studio, the recommended IDE for Android app development, on Chromebooks. It also lets them run Linux command line tools safely and securely in a container.

    • moonpiedumplings@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Termux recently got moved off of the play store (kinda), and is now only available on f-droid/github, because Google was further locking down what they allowed on their store.

      And in addition to that, they recently added a restriction in later versions of Android: “Child process limit”. Although this limit used to not there, when enabled, it prevents users from truly running arbitrary linux programs, like via termux.

      Although the child process limit can still be disabled in developer options, it doesn’t bode well for how flexible base android in the future will be, since many times corpos like Google move stuff into the “secret” options before eventually removing that dial all together.

      TLDR: Termux has been, and is a thing… for now.

      Also, I want to shout out winlator. It uses a linux proot, similator to termux, and has box64 and wine inside that proot that people can use to play games. I tested with Gungeon, and it even has controller support and performance, which is really impressive.

    • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      124
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yeah but I bet google’s one will have lots of cool features like being harder to use and not supporting becoming root and requiring google play services for no discernable reason

      • bamboo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 hours ago

        If it’s anything like ChromeOS, it’ll be a VM where you can do whatever you want, within that VM.

    • Quack Doc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Termux has been a thing for years.

      Termux is not a full linux environment, you need proot (slow) or chroot (insecure) to get a full environment.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Termux doesn’t run arbitrary software. There’s a pretty large set that does but plenty doesn’t. A VM would resolve that.

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Through termux you can already install a full linux distro on android. It is a little slow, but full desktop environment. Not bad if you have a phone that supports display output

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        So is termux a containerized Linux? (I haven’t looked into it yet, just on my list). I had assumed it was a VM, guess I was incorrect.

  • mindlight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Yeah… While making users run Linux applications on a system where Google is root might be a wet dream for Google, it’s more of a nightmare for me.

    I really hate the fact that the vast majority of consumers are perfectly fine with not being in full control of their appliances and that Google (and others) register everything they do.

    • Quack Doc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I personally run a custom rom, even with that I find this very exciting, This should balance the Security, Perf, Convience, aspects quite nicely

    • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I thought the snapdragon Samsung rooting would be farther along than where we are now. I’m stuck with my phone until further notice s23u

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The reason so many people are fine with using corporate garbage is ironically the same reason they’d be just fine using something that wasn’t that. Users can adapt and learn a system way better than most people think.

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It’s the convenience angle.

        I have very experienced IT friends who continue to use privacy invasive crap, knowingly because they like the convenience.

        • flashgnash@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          That kinda thing is a sliding scale for everyone, if my Linux machine wasn’t 90% as reliable and usable as when I was on windows I would probably still be using windows

        • Kairos@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Yep. Because that’s the default. And the corporate garbage says that the other stuff is a worse experience.

          • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Well, it is.

            It’s a lot more work to use not-Google stuff on Android. Which I try very hard to do.

            Now trying to get a family member to install and run anything not from the Play store is like pulling teeth.

  • tate@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    an all-in-one app for running a Linux distro in a VM.

    No, it won’t

    let you run Linux apps on Android

    It will let you run Linux apps in Linux

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Plasma Mobile for Android? 🤔

      Doubtful. A VM doesn’t have access to the underlying hardware (unless explicitly passed through).

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          not doubtful, a lot of compositors, kwin included can run nested.

          It’s not a question if some of Plasma Mobile could run in that VM. It’s a question if anything usable is possible. I highly doubt Google will make it possible to call phone numbers etc. in that VM.

    • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I was thinking the same thing! But it would be running from a Debian VM so I’m not sure how realistic that is. And I doubt it would have access to android apps.

  • Quack Doc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Very exciting stuff, Really hope wayland gets hooked up. if not, well, we can make it work somehow

  • Mossy Feathers (They/Them)@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Google is still working on improving the Terminal app as well as AVF before shipping this feature. AVF already supports graphics and some input options, but it’s preparing to add support for backing up and restoring snapshots, nested virtualization, and devices with an x86_64 architecture.

    This is the part I cared about. Can it run x86_64 programs, or is it just an ARM-compatible version of Debian?

    If it can actually run x86_64 programs on ARM devices, then that’s kinda fucking sick and would likely help the world transition to ARM. Like, fuck Google, but this sounds like a good thing, maybe?

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Can it run x86_64 programs

      The article sound like it will work for x86 devices running Android as well. I don’t think this is about emulation.

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      devices with an x86_64 architecture

      Sounds like the opposite of what you want; you would want x86_64 code on devices with an ARM architecture.

      But I didn’t actually read the article, so maybe that line is poorly worded

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      That just sounds painfully inefficient (though we’ve been doing stuff like this for decades).

      Arm isn’t as efficient at higher cpu states as x86, and running a VM you’re definitely going to up the cpu usage.

      Still interesting to watch. And every use-case is unique. For the typical short-run process this is for, it’ll probably be fine.

  • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Chromebooks have the advantage of being mostly a laptop with a keyboard, mouse-analog and largish screen… Phones don’t really have that, so it seems an odd choice to me. Especially for a platform which is hostile to giving users permissions to install software on their own devices.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    I don’t really see the need. It would be nice to have KVM but other than that I don’t see much point.

    • Quack Doc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I personally really like runing full chroot on my device, this will fit a similar role with more security and convenience.