I said a while back that I was gonna change my name due to my obscene displeasure with the final season but… nah. I’m Stamets. I love my lil gay boy and I love his lil gay family and I love the ship with the weirdly long nacelles.

  • AlexisFR@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    26 days ago

    Not for long tough. they only have to “Kelvin” the 31st century timeline.

    • Stamets@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      32nd. Also no clue what you’re talking about. Either you’re suggesting that something from the ‘real’ Prime Universe is gonna breakthrough into the 32nd century or that it’s going to be retroactively made into a split timeline, a thing that never happened to the Kelvin movies as being an alternate timeline was the literal point of the movie.

      • AlexisFR@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        Honestly I just don’t understand why they didn’t make Discovery with the intention of it being part of, and expanding the Kelvin Timeline. Was ST Beyond that bad ?

        • Stamets@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          Because they didn’t… want to? They were self contained stories. We’re typically in the Prime Timeline. Star Trek Beyonds performance has literally no bearing on whether or not it would have been in the prime timeline. I don’t understand the weird obsession with forcing it to be in the Kelvin timeline.