• 1 Post
  • 185 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle


  • Cheers for the response, I appreciate it!

    I’m curious about the plugins as obviously I’m not gonna be familiar with the notepad++ plugin ecosystem now—what’s special about the ones you listed?

    Assuming edit EOL is just changing the line termination characters, all editors have that don’t they? Or does this not do what I think?

    Intrigued about VSCode being slow for text manipulation too—I remember this being a big reason I dropped notepad++ for sublime and IMO VSCode and sublime more or less have parity on that front, particularly with vim bindings


  • I just don’t get the love for notepad++

    I started using it as my main back in 2006ish, I then switched to sublime text about 2011, then about 5-6 years ago to VSCode. All the time using vim for any in-terminal quick edits.

    Notepad++ is easily my least favourite editor of the lot, by several miles, it just seems so rigid and clunky without even going into how it’s windows only. Every editor I’ve used since has been a huge improvement over the one prior IMO


  • Gotta add to your message under the video, partly because I like this creator and other small creators like him:

    I completely understand someone not wanting to get blasted by ads and tracking from YouTube—however if you’re using one of these YouTube front ends, please consider sponsoring the creators you’re watching on patreon or something if you’re able to. If everyone dodged the ads and didn’t also sponsor the creator in some way, they’re eventually just gonna stop being able to make content because the necessary income to justify the work is simply not going to be there.

    I hate ads as much as the next guy, but it’s important to remember it’s a big part of how these people can afford to make the videos we enjoy. So particularly with smaller creators, happily dodge the ads, but make sure they’re still getting something for their work.












  • 9point6@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.worldWhy is UI design backsliding?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Flat design may be less distracting to you but that also means it’s less clear, because there are fewer obvious demarcation.

    I despise flat design, it’s downright awful design, and done for looks rather than functionality.

    to you

    Flat design dominates for a reason—the less visually busy something is, the easier it is for users to wrap their heads around it. This gets proven again and again in user studies, the more busy and dense you make things, the more users miss stuff and get lost.

    People’s opinions on the ribbon specifically are obviously all subjective, but I would say the less distracting design would be the one done less for looks, rather it’s a pretty utilitarian design if you pick it apart. This is an interface for productivity tools, and as such the interface should get out of your way until you need it—the ribbon just does that better IMO.

    Microsoft also did this to obfuscate features, which is pretty apparent when you consider new users used to “discover” features via the menu system. I supported Office for MS in the early days, and this was a huge thing at the time. It was discussed heavily when training on new versions.

    Why on earth would Microsoft want to obfuscate features? There’s no way that motivation would ever make sense.

    IIRC one of the main reasons Microsoft introduced the ribbon was that grouping functionality contextually helped users discover features, because people kept requesting features that already existed, but they just couldn’t find. I remember there being a blog on the Microsoft developer site about the making of it that went into this.



  • 9point6@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.worldWhy is UI design backsliding?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Weirdly as someone who has used both styles heavily, I’d say the ribbon is more practical than the old toolbars. There’s more contextual grouping and more functional given the tabs and search, plus the modern flat design is less distracting, which is what I’d want from a productivity application. Also for me two rows of toolbars & a menu is about the same height as the ribbon anyway, and you can collapse the ribbon if you want to use the space