![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/ed7bd7d8-a25a-496b-8c3c-3715ec09b129.png)
All the cool kids learned it from the bloodhound gang.
All the cool kids learned it from the bloodhound gang.
If we did we’d have to start handing over politicians lol
Doesn’t it cost to renounce your citizenship too?
So do the robes have kneepads built in these days or do they have to get them altered special?
Yes yes, but what color are their shirts?
That could be super dangerous for both of them.
No… Don’t… Stop…
“Well, well, well, if it isn’t the consequences of my own actions.”
It’s not though. See Thomas. Also the seemingly never ending parade of GOP officials.
If it’s their team it’s NBD, I’m very surprised this has had any consequences. I bet it’s more he bit the hand that fed him.
You’re an air squid, your exposure is limited.
Feel like the real underdog here is seafood.
Like, we know toxins concentrate in water creatures. That’s why you’ll see way more warnings about fish you harvest on any DNR page than you will deer.
hipster engineering -
“Man I’m just saying, committing the Laplace tables to memory and working with a slide rule just hits different.”
That’s crazy. You can’t do six. It’s seven! SEVEN MINUTE ABS!
It’s a surprisingly good comparison especially when you look at the reactions: frame breaking vs data poisoning.
The problem isn’t progress, the problem is that some of us disagree with the Idea that what’s being touted is actual progress. The things llms are actually good at they’ve being doing for years (language translations) the rest of it is so inexact it can’t be trusted.
I can’t trust any llm generated code because it lies about what it’s doing, so I need to verify everything it generates anyway in which case it’s easier to write it myself. I keep trying it and it looks impressive until it ends up at a way worse version of something I could have already written.
I assume that it’s the same way with everything I’m not an expert in. In which case it’s worse than useless to me, I can’t trust anything it says.
The only thing I can use it for is to tell me things I already know and that basically makes it a toy or a game.
That’s not even getting into the security implications of giving shitty software access to all your sensitive data etc.
Source: I’ve been an embedded sw engineer for 10+ years
This seems like a pretty decent resource generally speaking. I’ll add this caveat though.
If your threat model includes anyone with large state level resources, you should stay very far away from anything with a radio in it. Wifi, Bluetooth, NFC, whatever, it doesn’t matter. It is possible for it to be compromised at a silicon level, which means you can never be sure it is fully secure.
You have to assume that anything transmitted via RF of any type is capable of being collected and compromised.
All that said, if your concern actually does include people with black helicopters, you already know this, and if it doesn’t, just remember that these technologies are getting cheaper and more ubiquitous all the time (see stingray), so be careful.
Analogue doesn’t have firmware that can reject a device based on id.
So you can reverse engineer a replacement part if you absolutely have to.