I always say it’s wild when politician says “Jew has the right to a jewish state” coming from countries that work hard to separate church from state, and the country behave exactly as ISIS.
I always say it’s wild when politician says “Jew has the right to a jewish state” coming from countries that work hard to separate church from state, and the country behave exactly as ISIS.
I am surprised the name of the manufacture is not out. This basically raise privacy concern.
I like how “American citizen” killed is very critical to wash the genocide. Media will care if you are American Citizen only if you help their agenda. I still remember how they ignored the murder of Shireen Abu Akleh
One important point: “ the other claims to use them as hostages while not really negociating their release either.” is false.
Hamas did and still agree to a biden resolution.
What happen after? Everyday israel kills a range goes from 15 to 150. Assassinate two of the main negotiator for hamas. Continue depriving civilian in gaza ( basically children and women) from basic life needed support ( limited food and medicine - limited access to water ) and ask them to move from corner to another safe place to bomb them again in the save place.
Authoritian regimes doesnt need to pretend. If they find out you are a risk they don’t need to gather evidence to get you in prison, so they don’t need to pretend they care about censoring the internet for the wrong reasons.
The issue here is the west want to do the same but need a valid justification. Instead of work to stop the actual abuse in the first place they want access to the only way for many people to share information safely.
You could be technically letrate and find your way around all the restrictions, but many people are not and they need access to secure communication channels to arrange there activism.
The fact we don’t see backlash against twitter, Facebook, Google, and Apple tells alot about what is this about.
The fact we are seeing more support for “consent” for kids, and the fact that there were many major cases such as Epstein and Maxwell which has been obscured or even hidden when it comes to major profilic people says alot about their intent.
Imagine only targetting Telegram and not Meta and Twitter.
Ewww
“We didn’t do anything to you this is hamas fault” Blinken, USA
Why this is a problem? In a country that selling guns and weapons is legal what wrong in using online websites for this?
I read this and I was not surprise because since October they have been blaming Hamas for the genocide in Gaza, and it seems this form of gaslighting is engrave in USA politics.
This nice to have to keep people who say only “democracy in the middle East” and “not apartheid state” quite…
Rich coming from someone supporting biden.
Suggesting that hamas is corrupt and their goal is to steal money doesnt make sense. Their leaders in and out of gaza has been being targeted all the time. If you want to get rich you could easily go to west bank and live happily with LPO who are the actual thieves.
USA: long history of interfering with foreign election, and other countries politics with public support for specific candidate.
Russia: do the same.
USA: How can they do that!?
It is amazing they don’t mention in the article how many children and innocent people died and dying due to the use of these technology. Keeping the wording at “armed conflict between Israel and Hamas”
So where we can find these data to check out?
Why blaming all humanity for what the zaionist, UK, and US are doing?
Here an easy resource from a website that usually have receipt: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_war_crimes?wprov=sfti1
Here is some notes to help you with wikipedia.
you read the overall sentence. Usually it ends with a source or multiple. Usually news article, research paper, books, blogs and many other form.
sometimes you can open the link to it is own specific page which usually have more details.
if you are not sure about a specific incident or don’t like the wordings, you can:
You remember when people were confused where ISIS people come from? It is the same for the IDF.
When you tell people they can get citizenship, a home, and some free stuff. People who agree are not normal. People who stay are not normal, and considering morally ethical people would not participate or leave, you end up with immoral, inhumane with latest weapons who are ready to kill their own anytime. These people don’t care because they believe their leaders will protect them and maybe good will reward them.
Now add to that the scum who for 7 or 8 month still giving them the support. I put them in the same level of inhumane, low for of people, losers.
I dont know when they were a hero. The IDF was designated terrorist organization from the start.