I though it was working against Big Baby *ahem*
I though it was working against Big Baby *ahem*
Right, that wasn’t the right word there, but you get what I mean.
I hope you interpret “to death” as an euphemism in that case hah
The bible seems to consider it murder only if it’s another christian.
[if someone] has gone and served other gods and worshiped them, […] you shall stone that man or woman to death with stones.
-Deuteronomy 17:2-5
If your brother, the son of your mother, or your son or your daughter or the wife you embrace or your friend who is as your own soul entices you secretly, saying, ‘Let us go and serve other gods,’ […] you shall kill him. Your hand shall be first against him to put him to death.
-Deuteronomy 13:6-10
so at leat 4 burgers per bald eagle
Speech recognition has existed far before 2019.
Huh? I’ve never had a problem with mine.
Ford was an innovative car maker, Musk bought an innovative car maker. They are not the same.
I agree, but you asked specifically about legality.
Well, the question was on the practice’s legality, not its morality.
So yes.
No, it was added to the Geneva convention in 1977
why not both?
If parents keep throwing kids into the public piranha tub, I’m absolutely blaming the parents, but I will still question why we keep a public piranha tub.
I agree (or rather, disagree) with both sides here. Australia should of course not be able to order global takedowns, but xitter should want to take it down anyways for their own reasons.
I see no problem with this, if they federate instances can choose to pick them up or not
How many hoops did you have to jump through to land at that comparison?