![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
What’s crazy is someone saying “It’s somewhere you’d bring a baby to without a second thought” about a fucking shopping mall
What’s crazy is someone saying “It’s somewhere you’d bring a baby to without a second thought” about a fucking shopping mall
Yep you’re getting it. That (additional context, or speculation, or opinions) would have to be a separate article, according to the charter. Linking the facts with someone else’s opinion isn’t allowed, but doing a separate opinion piece (clearly labelled) is ok
This article is reporting facts as they are 100% known, as per the charter. There are no known facts that the pedo was murdered or topped himself, due to obfuscation of the information. It’s reported as known, even if that’s a bit sparse. AP and Reuters do the same.
You will also be able to find opinion pieces on the BBC on the same subject, you just can’t mix the two, as is the case in most journalism nowadays
I said by law because it’s easier than “royal charter” but it amounts to the same
It’s the BBC, not the Guardian. The journalist literally can’t, by law, add “in suspicious circumstances”
World of Goo!
I was trying to remember that when I saw the question
I don’t like mobile gaming but oh my god that’s such a well designed game
You’re a viking that died
Pretty sure they all did that
if these people could just get it through
theretheir heads to quit whiletherethey’re ahead
Fuck me that’s just fucking laziness innit?
Really surprised it’s the only book related fork of the fediverse here
Do people not read any more?
Reviews seem to be saying it drives exceptionally well
I’m guessing here, but did 100% of these reviews come from a country with some of the worst fucking drivers on the entire planet?
Just for info, spray paint you buy in shops now is shit because it’s basically water based
Under no circumstances should you search online for “2K” spray paint as it’s a two part paint, almost like epoxy resin and would be almost impossible to remove from a shitty pile of junk
Then your fine is what? How much?? I demand to know
It’s still a mistake, no matter whether yo cn undrstnd th sntnce
If only a very small handful of people make the same mistake, it doesn’t evolve the language, it’s just a mistake, plain and simple.
I know you’re just trying to make yourself feel a wee bit morally superior by saying that, but it’s the complete opposite of how language evolution works
Remember the yanks have pink fluffy girly 110v electricity. They’ve only just been told about kettles and they think a microwave is a cooking device
You don’t have the option to scan stuff as you go?
That’d be why they’re only just implemented old tech like electronic price tags
Great list, thanks!
Aldi has been doing it forever
That’s because most supermarkets in Europe have had these systems for about 15 years. As usual, the yanks are a decade behind and find a way to use it for greed :(
English or English [Simplified]?
Nah op is in the right here, it’s a really reliable indicator of ragebait, tabloid and/or amateur journalism