![](https://discuss.tchncs.de/pictrs/image/5d1febb4-7e3d-4dc3-8c9a-088d81dc739e.jpeg)
![](https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/045a2049-eb61-4960-88ba-97e7f1ffbf31.jpeg)
If they didn’t in all that time, it’s probably because they don’t want to keep their account.
That’s an assumption that leads to corporate bullshit like this.
Gay furry IT person.
If they didn’t in all that time, it’s probably because they don’t want to keep their account.
That’s an assumption that leads to corporate bullshit like this.
In that case why block the add-ons in the first place? There is a risk that the “Mozilla is blocking privacy friendly add-ons on the behest of an authoritarian regime!” news will become more widely known than any correction. If it had been a planned PR move then any person involved in it should never work in marketing again.
I was thinking the whole week if I should vote the greens or the pirates but due to the recurring campaigns to establish a surveillance state I did end up voting pirates. Incredibly disheartened they didn’t get a seat :(
I remember warning labels on BIOS updates that basically said that if nothing is broken, don’t do the update because the risk of bricking the device did not outweigh any potential benefits. That vendors are now pushing mandatory BIOS updates through Windows Update is terrifying.
If one does that, be prepared to defend yourself against the copyright infringement lawsuit that’s coming your way eventually.