A quick skim says anonymity is protected under it, with exceptions. Mostly for criminal acts. Particularly here, if the leaked artwork falls under “intellectual property” then the exception applies and anonymity isn’t protected.
A quick skim says anonymity is protected under it, with exceptions. Mostly for criminal acts. Particularly here, if the leaked artwork falls under “intellectual property” then the exception applies and anonymity isn’t protected.
As a country well-versed in revolutions, China can tell you it all ends up as warlords vying for hegemonic dictatorship regardless of the original intent.
Due to the outstanding success of school shootings, management has decided to pursue a “growth” strategy and diversify their portfolio.
Going eco is all the rage, so probably tree fiddy.
The mirror is also an allegory.
Whether righteous or unwarranted, hate is hate. And acting in hate is just that, acting in hate, no matter your reason.
Apparently it might be what happens when they’re trying to extract every bit of wealth possible before crushing it into nothingness and then moving on to the next parasitized host.
I call hijinx and shenanigans! Look at OPs nickname! This is exactly the type of game they’d be into based solely on that.
Space dad jokes.
Some other article said it simpler. If the game launched for free and they focused on microtransactions for skins, they’d be one of the live service games that brings in the money.
Spanish hookups do have a history of exterminating large parts of a population.
I’m of the belief that we’re all a little disturbed in some way, only that most people prefer the comfort of boring over the satisfaction of disturbing. And the most boring of people are simply better at hiding their quirks.
You’re talking of specific people then, not “People” in general.
Can you though? One has to take precedence eventually.
It’s a very nice set of replies. Quite pleasant to read. Thank you for the whole thing.
People like big buts.
thought must be influenced by some level of internal stimulation, as you can deprive your senses and still think. Likewise, before you have the capability of memory, you are not conscious, it is simply impossible. Consciousness is directly tied to the ability to remember. Thusly it must be some mix of the two, life experiences, and remembered experiences.
Isn’t the internal stimulation just the nervous system zapping things to get a response? And doesn’t that need a trigger to get it going?
Anyway, I feel like I’m heading into contested territory here, but I gotta ask. At which point can we consider babies as conscious?
Most people will claim their earliest memory is at the age of 4 or 5 years old. So that time is probably considered as the general start of conscious identity. Yet some have reported that simulating the conditions in a womb such as sleeping in a fetal position or floating aimlessly within a larger body of water will grant them an instinctual sense of serenity. So it can be argued that at some level, we remember our time in the womb, even though we are not able to recall it directly.
And I’ve seen babies aged around 1-2 years old trying (unsuccessfully) to hide from their parents in order to attempt an action that had been forbidden several times before.
How early does our capability to store memory actually start? And at which point will the amount of stored and remembered experience be enough to count as consciousness?
They are always open to enforce a form of bigotry. So your focus should be instead on that and prevent reaching this situation. Or what? You expect to stop a series of arsons with one bucket of water?
So they have to default on yours instead?
If the kid ends up in that kind of environment, just one teacher using their actual name is the least of the things you should be concerned about.
Not just Nintendo. That PS jailbreak dude is still suffering from the lawsuit Sony threw at him over a decade ago. And so is Sony, but that one is well deserved, unlike the former.