• Stereotype_Be@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s a good question. I think I’ll take a sequel 40 years later over an awful remake that’s bound to change a lot of the original story.

    • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think you’re right. As an example there’s the Paul Rudd Ghostbusters movies. Ok sequel, nothing really wrong with it. The second one wasn’t watchable, but at least they’re not trying to replace the originals.