• Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I personally find that identity politics is far too often used as a shield against genuine criticism. Some corporate types create something bland, or just outright terrible, and add a whole lot of tokenism. Someone points out that the story is terrible, the characters are terrible, and that it seems to do nothing but pander, and they’re immediately likened to some of the worst people on Earth.

    Surely only the most militant alt-right extremist would criticise these committee curated progressive consumable products!

    Short answer is “yes”, although it’s much less of a tribe and more just the average person.

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 minutes ago

      Do you have an example? I’m cynical, I believe companies would add diverse but two-dimensional characters to pander to an audience.

      But then I thought only actual bigots were called out, like if they’re screeching that some “anachronistic” black character exists in a game that also contains magic spells and dragons. I thought normal complaints like “story is awful and characters have no depth” are generally received without an antagonistic response.